September 29, 2009

  • You need to see this...

    Now they're praying to Obama.
    Since listening to this, Gabe has said he thinks they are actually saying "God" rather than "Obama." That very well could be.
    From Liberty Council:

    Barack Obama has nominated far-left homosexual rights advocate Chai Feldblum to the Equal employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) - a move that makes Congress' new push to pass the anti-faith ENDA bill even more dangerous to the rights of Christians.

    Consider this...Not only is Feldblum a former legal counsel for the ACLU and the pro-homosexual Human Rights Campaign, she is a CO-AUTHOR of the ENDA bill that she could soon be enforcing!

    And what is Feldblum's agenda?  Incredibly, Feldblum says that when there is a conflict between religious freedom and homosexual rights, "...society should come down on the side of protecting identity liberty of LGBT people" (LGBT stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered).

    Obama Nominates Chai Feldblum as EEOC Commissioner



    ENDA: Just the Beginning of Frivolous Lawsuits

    Today, I filed written testimony with Congress on H.R. 3017, the "Employment Non-Discrimination Act," (ENDA) which would extend special civil rights protections to homosexuals and cross-dressers. It includes new FRC research on the impact that these laws have had on states localities across the country. In Oregon, one employee who sued for "discrimination" had, according to his employer, actually been fired for "cheating on an exam" and "repeatedly showing up late for work." Another charged "discrimination" for his "perceived" orientation--he was a straight male, but was criticized for wearing earrings. And these were considered the most "substantial" cases! In several cases, large settlements were paid despite evident weaknesses in the cases brought. Two of the homosexual plaintiffs had themselves been credibly accused of sexual harassment by co-workers.

    Such cases can be very costly to employers--including to public employers, who must pay these settlements with taxpayer dollars. And while the sponsors of the companion "hate crimes" bill insist it will not apply to speech, the same is not true of ENDA-type legislation, under which even "anti-gay remarks" in the workplace can trigger charges. ENDA would make our society more litigious and make both consumer goods and public services more costly--and those are among the many good reasons to oppose it.

    Sustain: Government must fund abortion

    Safe schools chief encouraged child sex with older man

Comments (4)

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment